Table of Contents
District Diagnostic Reports

Interpreting the Data

The Bar Chart

The purpose of the District Diagnostic reports is to help the district assess the growth of students at different achievement levels. These reports can help teachers and administrators set priorities for improving the instructional program to meet the needs of students at all achievement levels.

To compare growth across groups, it can be helpful to focus on the chart first.

In this chart, the green line represents expected growth. The blue bars represent the growth of students in the most recent year. On the District Diagnostic and District Performance Diagnostic reports, if you have data from previous years, you'll also see gold bars on the chart. The gold bars represent the growth of students for this district in the same subject and grade or course for up to three previous years. In other words, the blue bars represent the cohort of students from the most recent year, while the gold bars represent previous years' cohorts.

Each bar has solid and dotted black whiskers. The solid whiskers mark one standard error above and below the growth measure, and the dotted whiskers mark two standard errors above and below the growth measure. It's important to consider the standard error as you interpret the growth measures represented by the bars on the chart. Consider the overall pattern of the bars rather than focusing on any individual value. However, it can be helpful to keep these guidelines in mind.

A bar that is at least one standard error above the line suggests that the group's average achievement level increased. If the bar is at least two standard errors above the line, the evidence of growth is even stronger.
Likewise, if the bar is at least one standard error below the green line, the group likely lost ground academically, on average. If the bar is at least two standard errors below the line, the evidence is stronger.
Regardless of whether the bar is above or below the green line, if it is within one standard error of the line, the evidence suggests the group's average achievement did not increase or decrease.

The Pie Chart

The slices of the chart are color-coded to indicate whether the group's average achievement level increased, decreased, or remained about the same compared to expected growth.

Diagnostic Color

Growth Measure Compared to Expected Growth

Interpretation

Green

At least 1 standard error above

Moderate evidence that the group exceeded expected growth.

Yellow

Between 1 standard error above and 1 standard error below

Evidence that the group met expected growth.

Light Red

More than 1 standard error below

Moderate evidence that the group did not meet expected growth.

White

N/A

The group did not have enough students to generate a growth measure.

As you reflect on these reports, you might want to ask yourself these questions:

  • Did each group make enough growth to at least meet expected growth?
  • Is there a difference in the amount of growth the groups made?
  • If there is a difference in the amount of growth across groups, what factors might have contributed to the differences?

For Diagnostic and Performance Diagnostic reports:

  • Is the overall pattern of growth consistent across grades for the same subject?
  • Is the overall pattern of growth consistent across subjects in the same grade?
  • Is the overall pattern of growth consistent across courses?
  • How does the pattern of growth for demographic subgroups compare to the pattern for all students?
  • How can this information inform course placement, instructional practices, strategies, and academic programs?